An agronomist with a citrus cooperative in Andalusia had been applying what was labeled as “chelated zinc EDTA” to Valencia orange trees showing interveinal chlorosis for two full growing seasons without seeing the response he expected. Soil zinc levels had been confirmed as deficient. The foliar spray timing and coverage were appropriate. Yet the visual response was marginal at best, and tissue sampling showed zinc concentration in young leaves barely moving. On a hunch from a colleague who had seen similar things, he sent the product to a university lab for chelate identity testing. The result was unexpected: the product contained zinc chelated with HEDTA — hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid — not EDTA. The two chelates behave differently at the slightly acidic pH of the spray solution and at the leaf cuticle surface. The HEDTA complex has a lower stability constant than EDTA at the pH range of 4.5 to 6.5 that spray solutions typically sit in, meaning the zinc was dissociating from the chelate before reaching the intended uptake zone. Switching to a verified Zinc Disodium EDTA product the following season produced visible chlorosis correction within six weeks.