A postdoctoral researcher at a university molecular biology lab in Germany spent nearly three weeks chasing what she thought was a sample preparation error before a collaborator from a neighboring lab finally suggested the real problem. She was running denaturing RNA gel electrophoresis using a phosphate-based buffer system — cheaper to prepare and familiar from her previous lab — and the RNA bands from her total RNA extractions kept showing aberrant migration patterns, with the 28S ribosomal band running in an unexpected position relative to the 18S band. The gel images looked degraded, even though the RNA integrity measured fine on the nanodrop. Her collaborator, who had been doing RNA work for fifteen years, immediately recognized the problem: phosphate at the concentration being used was interacting with the formaldehyde in the denaturing gel system, interfering with the denaturation of RNA secondary structure. He handed her a bottle of MOPS buffer stock and told her to redo the gel. The next morning she had clean, sharp bands with the expected 2:1 intensity ratio between 28S and 18S. The three weeks of troubleshooting could have been avoided if she had known from the start that 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid — MOPS — is the standard choice for RNA electrophoresis and not an interchangeable substitute for phosphate.